When, in a constitutional regime, the rules governing the formation of the will, free choice of representatives of the people, the process of democratic decisions, the control function of acts of government, are repeatedly challenged, circumvented, enforced and altered by a parliamentary majority that, by recognizing the role and the reasons for opposition and ignoring the substantial part of the electorate that is not explicitly expressed through a vote, an exhibition of herself and just want to play not the general interest of the people that you govern;
when, as part of this majority, is attacked in a systematic and ruling, the work of the organs of the Judiciary, including the Supreme Court, in the case of adverse action to the acts of the government or people being part of his team (just as, on the other hand, are emphatically enhanced favorable court decisions);
when borne by the Government in its leadership or in its appearance, emerge emblematic cases of corruption or immorality, which are not reported and contrasted with energy, as expected, but are covered conspiratorial, denied, minimized, if not justified, and co-essential aspects such ostentatious exercise of power;
when the majority benefit of the consent election, expected to privatize the facilities and assets of the State, which is the common good, to channel financial resources generated by the combination of all taxpayers, in favor of policies for businesses, groups, social strata belonging to the dominant oligarchy and, against the democratic principle of equality of citizens in the name of 'freedom' based on the overwhelming power of money, renews and reinforces differences and privileges in the field of information, education, health, employment, distribution of wealth;
when this occurs and does not seem possible, in the usual way, bring the action subversive a government within the spirit and guided by the common law (that no elected majority is allowed to deform and break under the particularistic vision of its leaders) to a national sovereign, the people who are the primary source of law and to whom, in Ultimately, the legality of the acts and conduct of state organs, all that remains is the ' appeal to Heaven. "
* * * With this package
John Locke, the father of modern constitutionalism, he pointed to the 'right of resistance ' injustice of a power forgetful of its origin, its limits, its scope by linking it to the irreducible freedom of the individual, from which it springs, as the extreme right, along with all other rights that are recognized and guaranteed in the constitutional order of the State.
For Locke, there are, in fact, some rights 'natural', and the rrinunciabili intangibles that can not be tampered with by the powers that be, even with majority decisions and, therefore, apparently in accordance with democratic norms, but in fact, arbitrary.
If this happens, the citizen is entitled to exercise the right of resistance, with individual actions and collective disobedience, protest and revolt, aiming not to overthrow the state, but the defense and the restoration of constitutional legality violated.
That these fundamental human rights as an individual who chooses to live independently in society and accept the rules of coexistence, arising, for Locke, the 'nature' and its Creator-who wanted the men 's and Iberians equal '- or rather on the ethical conscience and moral choice, which recognizes them and establishing them as such, has no great practical significance.
What matters is that there is one for all ' heaven', whose appeal against the degeneration power, a sphere of pre-commitments and responsibilities policies which prevent the exercise becoming fools or slaves passive instruments of power degenerated. * * *
The constitutions of civilized states recognize this higher dimension of human experience and transform the freedom and equality of human beings, who are based in this place, in positive rights, which the legislative and policy should be uniform . They require that citizens have a pact of allegiance to the state that chooses to live, which comes before obedience to the laws and which prefigures the duty of 'resistance', in the case licenses and persistent deviations of substantive and procedural, constitutional bodies and the interest of the people as it is objectively determined in the Basic Law.
Faithful to democratic republic, all citizens aware of it, can not remain indifferent to the state of depression, suffering, despair, loss of real freedom, in which layers pay increasingly large and growing number of sectors of Italian society, while some people took advantage and laughs, pulling the wool over the eyes with the policy of the great works of controversial utility, which cost the community an enormous waste of public money, or intended to be intercepted from a world of political and business " harpies and bloodsuckers that harm the people " (Locke). And while you're working hard to lay the foundations for a personalist-authoritarian regime, according to the company's top-model, based on the decisions of the head, removed out of control and responsibility. This reduces the space of democracy, the sacrifices are necessary, they are used at the discretion. the whip and repression, rewards and donations, handling of information, this process of strategic plans and agreements are made in locations other than institutional, in defiance of public debate that democracy requires.
We live in an exceptional time. It would be a tragic mistake pretend that nothing has changed and that competition policy can still play in terms of a normal and fair democratic process. If the regions will give up the opposition, already shattered, will be reduced under conditions of no harm and the new regime will start towards their consolidation. Then, every citizen will be called upon to choose whether to give up the dream of a world more free and more just or appeal to the "sky."
Vee
when, as part of this majority, is attacked in a systematic and ruling, the work of the organs of the Judiciary, including the Supreme Court, in the case of adverse action to the acts of the government or people being part of his team (just as, on the other hand, are emphatically enhanced favorable court decisions);
when borne by the Government in its leadership or in its appearance, emerge emblematic cases of corruption or immorality, which are not reported and contrasted with energy, as expected, but are covered conspiratorial, denied, minimized, if not justified, and co-essential aspects such ostentatious exercise of power;
when the majority benefit of the consent election, expected to privatize the facilities and assets of the State, which is the common good, to channel financial resources generated by the combination of all taxpayers, in favor of policies for businesses, groups, social strata belonging to the dominant oligarchy and, against the democratic principle of equality of citizens in the name of 'freedom' based on the overwhelming power of money, renews and reinforces differences and privileges in the field of information, education, health, employment, distribution of wealth;
when this occurs and does not seem possible, in the usual way, bring the action subversive a government within the spirit and guided by the common law (that no elected majority is allowed to deform and break under the particularistic vision of its leaders) to a national sovereign, the people who are the primary source of law and to whom, in Ultimately, the legality of the acts and conduct of state organs, all that remains is the ' appeal to Heaven. "
* * * With this package
John Locke, the father of modern constitutionalism, he pointed to the 'right of resistance ' injustice of a power forgetful of its origin, its limits, its scope by linking it to the irreducible freedom of the individual, from which it springs, as the extreme right, along with all other rights that are recognized and guaranteed in the constitutional order of the State.
For Locke, there are, in fact, some rights 'natural', and the rrinunciabili intangibles that can not be tampered with by the powers that be, even with majority decisions and, therefore, apparently in accordance with democratic norms, but in fact, arbitrary.
If this happens, the citizen is entitled to exercise the right of resistance, with individual actions and collective disobedience, protest and revolt, aiming not to overthrow the state, but the defense and the restoration of constitutional legality violated.
That these fundamental human rights as an individual who chooses to live independently in society and accept the rules of coexistence, arising, for Locke, the 'nature' and its Creator-who wanted the men 's and Iberians equal '- or rather on the ethical conscience and moral choice, which recognizes them and establishing them as such, has no great practical significance.
What matters is that there is one for all ' heaven', whose appeal against the degeneration power, a sphere of pre-commitments and responsibilities policies which prevent the exercise becoming fools or slaves passive instruments of power degenerated. * * *
The constitutions of civilized states recognize this higher dimension of human experience and transform the freedom and equality of human beings, who are based in this place, in positive rights, which the legislative and policy should be uniform . They require that citizens have a pact of allegiance to the state that chooses to live, which comes before obedience to the laws and which prefigures the duty of 'resistance', in the case licenses and persistent deviations of substantive and procedural, constitutional bodies and the interest of the people as it is objectively determined in the Basic Law.
Faithful to democratic republic, all citizens aware of it, can not remain indifferent to the state of depression, suffering, despair, loss of real freedom, in which layers pay increasingly large and growing number of sectors of Italian society, while some people took advantage and laughs, pulling the wool over the eyes with the policy of the great works of controversial utility, which cost the community an enormous waste of public money, or intended to be intercepted from a world of political and business " harpies and bloodsuckers that harm the people " (Locke). And while you're working hard to lay the foundations for a personalist-authoritarian regime, according to the company's top-model, based on the decisions of the head, removed out of control and responsibility. This reduces the space of democracy, the sacrifices are necessary, they are used at the discretion. the whip and repression, rewards and donations, handling of information, this process of strategic plans and agreements are made in locations other than institutional, in defiance of public debate that democracy requires.
We live in an exceptional time. It would be a tragic mistake pretend that nothing has changed and that competition policy can still play in terms of a normal and fair democratic process. If the regions will give up the opposition, already shattered, will be reduced under conditions of no harm and the new regime will start towards their consolidation. Then, every citizen will be called upon to choose whether to give up the dream of a world more free and more just or appeal to the "sky."
Vee
0 comments:
Post a Comment