So, back in Italy the 'discipline' in schools and public offices, complete with penalties for disobeying the authority of the superior hierarchical paternalistic warning up to expulsion and dismissal.
He felt the need, in a country where the main problems are certainly the rudeness and fannullaggine of students, the rudeness and poor employee performance and where necessary to restore a sense of duty and meritocracy.
Similarly, the company turns the page on the tolerance of the times in which the left exercised a harmful cultural hegemony, leaving prosper drugs, prostitution, homosexuality, transsexuality and addictions of all kinds, helping with its lax morals and libertine, the breakdown of the family, the killing of embryos (which are people), the disruption of life (even if after a coma that lasted for seventeen years ), the contamination of national identity and traditions through openness to foreign immigrants guilty.
Finally we return to order! The satisfaction of all right-thinking people concerned about the 'crisis of values', the People of 'Freedom', the government took office securely, managed to produce a turnaround, a change of climate, which is still perhaps the most do not realize, but there is already many signs. Television, public and private (there is no difference) there these days has provided two eloquent symbolic announcement.
Big Brother. The transmission of Mediaset is a metaphor for society, Orwellian, towards which we are quickly approaching footsteps. In it, an invisible Consistory, anonymous and one-sided, according to rules, adapted to circumstances, to check the public and private life of competitors affects their emotional, comments, judge and influence their conduct, subjecting them to physical stress and emotional, that put them to the test subjects and produce hysteria and childhood regressions. Everything is
their permission, from heterosexual sexual performances, and today, even man, that in fact constitute one of the outcomes of the scheduled game show, ahead of competitors which are carefully selected and placed for days and months in the same cage, with absolute disregard of the ties and affection that everyone has left out.
happens now that one of these competitors, and straight-handled skillfully directed by the Consistory, which keeps them unseen for the entire day, without warning let out a curse (it was already done in another 'reality'). Okay
sex, obscenity, vulgarity, everything is permitted in the apparently liberal television, that there propina garbage daily, of which authors and conductors or conductive become proud. But no, blasphemy! It 'a scandal for a nation that respects the Catholic moral (even if not all ten commandments). The presenter looks mortified in announcing the ruling of Big Brother. The competitor-one of the most balanced up to a first-time cries, publicly confesses his guilt and asks for forgiveness to my mother! But the severe trial descends upon his head as a final Judgement of God.
The first television channel was assisted, however, a real 'social drama', of those who According to anthropologists, to serve a community to determine who controls and dictates the rules and a sense of community life and who must obey.
The background is the exclusion of Morgan musician from the San Remo Festival, determined by the Director General of RAI, following an 'interview in which Morgan said to suffer from depression and taking care of cocaine. You know, the artists often grant these licenses. Moreover, it is likely that in that statement was an implicit request for help. Anyway who gives a bad example can not be admitted into the sacred temple of Sanremo.
In this case there was a real public debate, with Morgan in the role of the accused (Role, however, with great dignity), Bruno Vespa according to Torquemada, the Minister of Youth at the second accuser and Livia in the Turkish and Don Mazzi, ambiguous and chaplains, so that, while arguing in favor of mitigating the accused, were standardized at the end the sentence, trying to persuade him that it was right.
In either case, moralism, hypocrisy and the Pharisees were prevalent and showed the distance that now separates us from a liberal civilization. In fact, in a liberal state, no one can be condemned as a source of 'bad example'. Who, then, really has title to establish this, since the public communications through newspapers or television (which have a common interest to emphasize and amplify extemporaneous statements)? Ii readers and viewers, or a small Consistory of priests who arbitrarily assume the task as guardians of public morality? It seems that still has not been institutionalized in Italy the College of Censors.
And if there was, even if the rules of the Code vigessero Rocco, on the basis of what criteria you might decide that reckless expressions as a curse or a statement that no malice on the therapeutic value of drugs (at the very time that Parliament has finally approved the use of cannabis in pain) are 'bad example', the most obscene language newspaper as viewers are seeing more of expletives, insults, the quarrels of politicians, most of the stupid gossip, love affairs and amorastri exhibited in entertainment more vulgarly ostentatious wealth, or more naked female bodies, most of the scandals of a leadership corrupt and corrupting?
The 'discipline', strict morals, good manners, as always happens in authoritarian regimes, they require one-way and those that are universally denounced as vices by the power of the people are accepted as belonging the inviolable privacy of those who occupy high positions. They say that cocaine parliamentary circles in the classroom, it is certain that almost none of the elected representatives wanted to take the test. The common customer of a prostitute will soon be sanctioned for aiding and abetting. Not so the final'utilizzatore 'that, privately, but in a public building, received (it is said that did not know!) - High-class prostitutes and certainly has not been asked if this would not have passed unnoticed or was just accepted as a good example for adolescents or fathers of families, homeless and without a job. On the other hand anyone who thinks otherwise is suffering from 'social envy', or other ... Two moral
, two codes, two evaluation criteria, two forms of language and thought, in a schizophrenic society, where citizens, lost self-consciousness, is about to become, or act as a subject.
He felt the need, in a country where the main problems are certainly the rudeness and fannullaggine of students, the rudeness and poor employee performance and where necessary to restore a sense of duty and meritocracy.
Similarly, the company turns the page on the tolerance of the times in which the left exercised a harmful cultural hegemony, leaving prosper drugs, prostitution, homosexuality, transsexuality and addictions of all kinds, helping with its lax morals and libertine, the breakdown of the family, the killing of embryos (which are people), the disruption of life (even if after a coma that lasted for seventeen years ), the contamination of national identity and traditions through openness to foreign immigrants guilty.
Finally we return to order! The satisfaction of all right-thinking people concerned about the 'crisis of values', the People of 'Freedom', the government took office securely, managed to produce a turnaround, a change of climate, which is still perhaps the most do not realize, but there is already many signs. Television, public and private (there is no difference) there these days has provided two eloquent symbolic announcement.
Big Brother. The transmission of Mediaset is a metaphor for society, Orwellian, towards which we are quickly approaching footsteps. In it, an invisible Consistory, anonymous and one-sided, according to rules, adapted to circumstances, to check the public and private life of competitors affects their emotional, comments, judge and influence their conduct, subjecting them to physical stress and emotional, that put them to the test subjects and produce hysteria and childhood regressions. Everything is
their permission, from heterosexual sexual performances, and today, even man, that in fact constitute one of the outcomes of the scheduled game show, ahead of competitors which are carefully selected and placed for days and months in the same cage, with absolute disregard of the ties and affection that everyone has left out.
happens now that one of these competitors, and straight-handled skillfully directed by the Consistory, which keeps them unseen for the entire day, without warning let out a curse (it was already done in another 'reality'). Okay
sex, obscenity, vulgarity, everything is permitted in the apparently liberal television, that there propina garbage daily, of which authors and conductors or conductive become proud. But no, blasphemy! It 'a scandal for a nation that respects the Catholic moral (even if not all ten commandments). The presenter looks mortified in announcing the ruling of Big Brother. The competitor-one of the most balanced up to a first-time cries, publicly confesses his guilt and asks for forgiveness to my mother! But the severe trial descends upon his head as a final Judgement of God.
The first television channel was assisted, however, a real 'social drama', of those who According to anthropologists, to serve a community to determine who controls and dictates the rules and a sense of community life and who must obey.
The background is the exclusion of Morgan musician from the San Remo Festival, determined by the Director General of RAI, following an 'interview in which Morgan said to suffer from depression and taking care of cocaine. You know, the artists often grant these licenses. Moreover, it is likely that in that statement was an implicit request for help. Anyway who gives a bad example can not be admitted into the sacred temple of Sanremo.
In this case there was a real public debate, with Morgan in the role of the accused (Role, however, with great dignity), Bruno Vespa according to Torquemada, the Minister of Youth at the second accuser and Livia in the Turkish and Don Mazzi, ambiguous and chaplains, so that, while arguing in favor of mitigating the accused, were standardized at the end the sentence, trying to persuade him that it was right.
In either case, moralism, hypocrisy and the Pharisees were prevalent and showed the distance that now separates us from a liberal civilization. In fact, in a liberal state, no one can be condemned as a source of 'bad example'. Who, then, really has title to establish this, since the public communications through newspapers or television (which have a common interest to emphasize and amplify extemporaneous statements)? Ii readers and viewers, or a small Consistory of priests who arbitrarily assume the task as guardians of public morality? It seems that still has not been institutionalized in Italy the College of Censors.
And if there was, even if the rules of the Code vigessero Rocco, on the basis of what criteria you might decide that reckless expressions as a curse or a statement that no malice on the therapeutic value of drugs (at the very time that Parliament has finally approved the use of cannabis in pain) are 'bad example', the most obscene language newspaper as viewers are seeing more of expletives, insults, the quarrels of politicians, most of the stupid gossip, love affairs and amorastri exhibited in entertainment more vulgarly ostentatious wealth, or more naked female bodies, most of the scandals of a leadership corrupt and corrupting?
The 'discipline', strict morals, good manners, as always happens in authoritarian regimes, they require one-way and those that are universally denounced as vices by the power of the people are accepted as belonging the inviolable privacy of those who occupy high positions. They say that cocaine parliamentary circles in the classroom, it is certain that almost none of the elected representatives wanted to take the test. The common customer of a prostitute will soon be sanctioned for aiding and abetting. Not so the final'utilizzatore 'that, privately, but in a public building, received (it is said that did not know!) - High-class prostitutes and certainly has not been asked if this would not have passed unnoticed or was just accepted as a good example for adolescents or fathers of families, homeless and without a job. On the other hand anyone who thinks otherwise is suffering from 'social envy', or other ... Two moral
, two codes, two evaluation criteria, two forms of language and thought, in a schizophrenic society, where citizens, lost self-consciousness, is about to become, or act as a subject.
0 comments:
Post a Comment